Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Jordasch Explains This Week's Entourage: Stunted


In the grand tradition of Charge-Shot!!! writers reviewing shows they end up hating - or just hating themselves for kinda liking - Jordasch has decided to tackle HBO's Entourage, simultaneously the most satisfying and infuriating show on the network. Because reviewing the show is a largely fruitless effort at this point, he's decided simply to explain it, character by character.

Vince: Vinny is worried about looking like a pussy in front of a totally badass action director (he has a NECK tattoo!) because he doesn't want to do his own stunts in a seriously Robocop 2-looking generic action movie. We know this because he says the phrase, "I don't wanna look like a pussy" in just about every scene in which he appears. Seriously, would anyone fault a Hollywood actor for not wanting to drive a car over a ramp and into a burning building? Did anyone know that Will Smith and Tom Cruise did their own stunts a few times until they saw THIS episode of Entourage? More importantly, does anyone care?

But at least that action director is a total badas- wait...is that NICK CASSAVETES? Well GOD FORBID Vince appears wussy in the presence of the guy who directed THE FUCKING NOTEBOOK! A badass father does not a badass son make.

Drama: The mob banker from The Dark Knight doesn't wanna put Johnny in a new series that, of course, Johnny thinks he's perfect for. So he asks Ari to assemble a blah blah blah Drama's ugly blah blah blah setting him up for a hit blah blah blah unfortunately the only interesting person among the non-Ari main characters.

Eric: To be perfectly honest with you, I don't remember. But at least because Vince is the one worried about being a pussy in this episode, we don't have to hear everyone making fun of E for being one. Seriously, how often does Mark Wahlberg worry about being a pussy?

Turtle: Having finally put together that "hot girls driving limos" business idea he introduced in the fifth season, Turtle now has to contend with the Rhodes scholars he's hired as hot limo drivers. One particularly gifted driver loses a car, attributes her flightiness to her parents' impending divorce, and then gets sexually assaulted by Turtle. Didn't we get past the "Turtle is a loser" thing after he started banging Jamie-Lynn Siegler? And wasn't he enrolled at UCLA? And, now that I think about it, weren't three out of the five main characters in Italy to hang out with Vince while he shot the Ferrari movie?

Somebody needs to fire the fucking script girl.

Ari: Something about the NFL and trying to get Vince out of doing the stunt for Alpha Dog. Ari didn't yell nearly enough or fire nearly enough people in this episode, and he yelled a bunch and fired a few people.

Departing Words: I remember enjoying this episode while I was watching it, but now I can't figure out why. Oh wait, that's how I feel about the whole damn show.
Continue...

“True Blood” Isn’t For Sissies – But It Kind of Is

trueblood If you want to know what "True Blood" is all about, just watch the opening credits. Dead animals, crazy religions, old prejudices, commonplace brutality and sex, lots of sex, all coated in the filthy, sweaty patina of the Deep South. Sure, "True Blood" is also about vampires, steeped in the lore and whatnot, but who cares?

Despite some ostensibly thoughtful trappings - Vampires "come out of the coffin" in present-day America, exposing themselves to the fears and prejudices of their neighbors while quaffing a blood substitute called True Blood - the show isn't as smart as it might think it is. Season one is a standard murder mystery, offering no surprises as it saunters (confidently – to their credit, they know this ain't Agatha Christie) towards a bloody finale. Season two ditches the pretense altogether by opening with a corpse, hurtling into bacchanalia and ending with a vampire bursting into flame.

Vampires are hot shit right now, thanks to the effete, sulky bloodsuckers of Stephenie Meyer's Twilight series. Bandwagon-jumpers might be horrified by what they find in True Blood; conversely, snobs shunning the show on principle might be surprised by how much they like HBO's hottest show. Hit the jump to find out if "True Blood" is your, ah, cup of B-positive.

Humor me with a brief quiz.

You walk into a bar. The first person you notice is:

1. The willowy young man at the end of the bar. He sits alone, undoubtedly nursing some deep, spiritual wound.
2. The girl with a tattoo on her calf. She's bending over the pool table. If you were an inch shorter, you could probably see up her jean skirt. A half-smoked Newport twitches between her fingers in time with the Skynrd on the jukebox.
3. The couple fighting near the exit. They're unusually attractive, straight from a casting call for one of those Levi's commercials. Their strife is beautiful - fighting means you really love each other, right?

You're hungry. It's hot outside. What do you get?

1. A salad, dressing on the side. Your delicate constitution can’t stomach anything heavy in the summer months, and it’ll be easier to face yourself in the mirror tomorrow morning.
2. A nice, fat slice of pecan pie with a small hill of Vanilla ice cream. Heat is nothing that can't be fixed by a glass of sweet tea; pecan pie is a way of life.
3. Food? How can you eat when life's inescapable conflicts press down upon you?

While on an evening stroll, you witness a pickup truck hit a possum. You:

1. Throw up. That's what's inside of us?
2. Laugh. Holy shit, did you see that thing detonate?
3. Weep. Life is cruel and capricious. It could have been you. It might as well have.

While channel-surfing in the wee hours, you happen stumble upon a bit of fellatio. You:

1. Change the channel. Carnal pleasure is base and transient.
2. Get up to make some popcorn. Bodily fluids make you hungry, and this could take a while.
3. Linger a moment – it’s not gay if a girl’s involved, right?

You’re moving. Where to?

1. Neah Bay, Washington. Away from the world, you can spend days staring into the cold, dispassionate waters of the North Pacific.
2. Brinson, Georgia. You heard there are some decent faith healers around, and you have a demon that needs exorcisin’.
3. Close your eyes and point at the map. Is there a Starbucks and a Target nearby? You’re set.

If you answered 1 three or more times, you’re likely too fragile to see “True Blood” – watching vampires explode like gut-stuffed piñatas will send you crawling to sleep between mommy and daddy. If you answered 2, you’re the person the show’s creators had in mind. You should probably seek professional help.

If you answered 3, congratulations – you’re the coveted middle ground, and you’re why “True Blood” is such a success. Despite its over-the-top violence (tongue in cheek, even) and unapologetic nudity, the show isn’t a psychotic gore-fest. There’s enough romance and angst between Sookie and Bill, her vampire lover, to sate Twilight fans. Come daylight, Bill, a Civil War veteran turned vamp, retreats beneath the floorboards, leaving Sookie in bed alone. Can they move through a world of prejudice when they can’t even wake up together? Can they? asks the swelling soundtrack, Anna Paquin’s dimples and Stephen Moyer’s chiseled jaw?

But “True Blood” isn’t as baroque or dire as Meyer's series. It embraces light moments of comic relief or cartoonish violence to remind the viewer that this is, after all, television – if you aren’t having good, junky fun, you might as well be reading.

Continue...

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Larry King Live For Just A Bit Longer

Larry-King-picture This time next year, you won’t be able to find Larry King gracing the evening airwaves on CNN.

The New York Times Media Decoder blog reports that Larry King Live will come to an end sometime this fall.  Larry King’s nightly news program may come to a halt, but he’s not swearing off remaining with the network in a limited capacity.  In his initial CNN blog post, King said, “I’ll still be a part of the CNN family, hosting several Larry King specials on major national and international subjects.”  I like the way that he refers to the specials using his own name.

His negligible impact on this generation notwithstanding (my most vivid Larry King memory is the Letterman bit about him looking like an owl), King’s a remarkable figure in the cable news world.  Larry King Live apparently holds the Guinness world record for longest running show (twenty-five years) with the same host in the same time slot.  A lot of qualifiers there, sure, but it’s a remarkable feat considering how television’s changed since King started a quarter-century ago. 

The NY Times story mentions CNN’s declining ratings, including ratings for Larry King Live, citing the rise of partisan news programming (your FOX News, your Keith Olbermann, your Jon Stewarts to a certain extent) as a likely cause.  In an interview prior to the Guinness induction, King said, “We’re in a wave of opinion,” and “I’ve never brought my opinions to the show.”  He knows he’s an odd man out, and now it’s time for him to get out.

Who will carry the nonpartisan torch when the Owl King leaves us?  Anderson Cooper?  Maybe.  But he’s got plenty of opinions (not that I disagree with him).

Continue...

This Week on Audiosurf Radio – DJ Whatsyourname Edition

hello my name is Where do DJ names come from?  (Probably not here.)

Sure, DJ Jazzy Jeff was a dude named Jeff, and Mix Master Mike is a guy named Mike.  But Kid Koala is not a koala.  I’m not sure I know what Kool DJ Herc means.  And DJ Qbert and DJ Starscream are awesome nerd references but I have no idea why they fit into the club universe.

Flying under the odd DJ name banner is this week’s artist DJ Fire BlackAudiosurf featured some of his material months ago – on his birthday, no less – and I came away pretty impressed.  But that doesn’t explain his name.  All of my years with Final Fantasy games has conditioned me to think he’s referencing tried-and-true spell names.  I know that’s not the case, but it’s the story I’m telling myself.  So there.

Also, take this moment to remind yourself that DJ Fire Black is sixteen years old. 

The Songs 

I don’t know if I should be breaking up Parts One and Two of “Nightfire,” but since they’re organized so for your surfing pleasure, I’ll do the same.  Part One kicks off with an easy quarter note beat.  Get used to it.  Grow to like it.  Learn to love it.  You’ll be hanging out with it for a while.  In case you get a tad bored with the ceaseless bass, Monsieur Fire Black includes some high-pitched, syncopated synth.  It won’t wake your dog from a heroic nap, but it will keep you from nodding off during the song, which – I’m sorry – is more than a little likely.  I’ll admit I often deride electronica with extraneous haunting vocal lines (or whatever other bizarre melody the creator’s dreamed up), but “Nightfire” needs one in the worst way.  The ride picks up briefly in the middle downhill section.  The tempo increases.  Traffic spikes in a challenging way.  Unfortunately, the rest of the song relies on the aforementioned whining synth strobe and some panning tricks to get by. 

Part Two of “Nightfire” picks off right where the first left off and, thankfully, goes a little bit farther.  There’s more sonic variety here.  I can discern a melody.  In the beginning, there’s even some variation to the percussion.  The kick drum, while incredibly present for much of the song, does take some much-appreciated rest now and then.  You’ll notice a little less in the way of strobing synth, which is for the best, I think.  Once the tempo shot up a few ticks, I really eased into this one (as ironic as that sounds).  It’s easier to focus on playing the game when the sound in your ears isn’t so gratingly monotonous.  It does end rather abruptly, amidst a cavalcade of bright tunnels and heavy traffic.  I wonder if we’re to expect a third movement, or if – like some stories – we’d be better off with just the two.  Were this a movie and you needed to take a pee break (or you wanted to mouse over to Twitter for some World Cup or Miley Cyrus news), I’d wait for the loping uphill section in the middle.  It’s almost completely devoid of traffic.

If “Injection” is actually a remix of a BS song, it totally shows.  One of my favorite things about BS is mercilessly he iterates on his own material, refusing to linger in one mode for two long.  The song goes nearly two minutes without a bass line.  A rhythm is established early on and then the melody and mid-range instruments take over.  Heavy downbeats in the beginning cause such severe bumps it feels like the track itself is head banging.  The first third of the song continues to impress even after a workmanlike quarter note kick drum shores up the percussion sound.  Complexity is the key here.  Sure, many of the various musical ideas present would be hellacious to listen to on their own.  (But with their powers combined…)  The song’s simply greater than the sum of its parts.  Except the middle.  That part needs a good trimming.  If I took every substance mentioned in Infinite Jest, then followed it up by treating Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas like a recipe book, maybe I’d be high enough to sit through all eight minutes of this song.  As it stands, I’m not.  So I’d prefer to skip from one kickass slope to the next without all the yawning in between.  Don’t think I’m in anyway trying to dissuade you from trying “Injection,” you need to play this song so you can experience the final downhill curve.  Imagineers wish they could build a track so stunning. 

Author’s Note

All songs were played twice on the Pro difficulty using the Eraser and Vegas characters.  Feedback from the comments section seemed vaguely positive with a few outliers, such as skiddlywibble.  Skiddly found “Nightfire” extremely difficult to ride: “The pitch is horrible. I can't listen to this for thirty seconds without my ears ringing. Literally. I had to turn my sound off to do the track. Audiosurf shouldn't be an endurance test.”  While I didn’t feel like my ears were bleeding or anything, I am glad someone else found the upper register a little taxing on the old hearing holes.

Anyone who’s reading this without having played Audiosurf (including non-gamers!) should really check it out.

Continue...

Monday, June 28, 2010

The Domain of Porn?

If you've been having trouble finding pornography on the Internet, salvation has come at last. Last Friday, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) voted to allow a new top level domain name. Websites will soon be available with the suffix ".xxx," signifying adult content.

The dot-xxx domain name has been a long time in coming. As far back as 2005, there had been discussions at ICANN concerning a domain name for pornographic content, but this option was voted down multiple times, as ICANN members said that they did not want to get into the thorny debate of determining what was or was not pornography. An additional problem came from the rules that new domain names must be sponsored by a group that makes a case for it. The proposed .xxx domain name was sponsored by a group called the ICM Registry, whose motives remain questionable. ("I still question whether, in fact, there is a real sponsored community here," one ICANN board member griped).

Nonetheless, an independent review concluded that the ICM Registry's proposal followed all of ICANN's rules and guidelines for new domain names, and so the .xxx domain name will be available soon. It remains to be seen how popular the new suffix will be (remember when d0t-biz was going to be the new dot-com?).

Proponents of .xxx maintain that this will help keep pornography from seeping into the more civilized swaths of the Internet, avoiding fiascoes like the embarrassing whitehouse.com. (Though, it should be noted that there is no legal compulsion for pornography sites to include the .xxx suffix). But there are arguments against the new domain name from both the friends and foes of pornography. Some maintain that a .xxx suffix will make pornography more readily available to children by collecting it all in one place. Others worry that .xxx names will be easy to filter out, leading to possible censorship. And there is still the question of what, exactly, merits the triple X.

Excited about finding all your porn under one easy-to-remember domain name? Worried that the coming police state will censor all your adult needs? Sound off in the comments and let us know what you think!
Continue...

Thoughts of an Aspiring Music Snob:
Week 64 - Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers

Chris is trying to compensate for his lack of musical knowledge by immersing himself in one new artist each week. At the end of the week, he will write up a brief summary of his opinions. You can read about the origin and parameters of this project here.

Over the course of last week, I became fascinated with backing bands. For example, sometimes Tom Petty records an album with the Heartbreakers, sometimes the Heartbreakers are there but uncredited, and sometimes he's by himself. When the band started, how did Petty convince the rest of the musicians to let him plaster his name on the group? How do they feel when he goes off and records solo albums? Do they ever hang and play just as "The Heartbreakers"?

At least the Heartbreakers were inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame alongside Tom Petty in 2002. As far as I can tell, this is the first time in the Hall of Fame's history that a backing band was recognized alongside their more famous frontman (a feat repeated in 2003 with Elvis Costello and the Attractions). But Bruce Springsteen was inducted without the E Street Band, Neil Young without Crazy Horse, Prince without the Revolution, Bob Marley without the Wailers. The entire process seems sort of arbitrary - I feel that the E Street Band is far more important to Springsteen than the Attractions are to Costello.

But that's the interesting things about these supporting outfits - it's hard to determine how much of an influence they actually have. Tom Petty is clearly the Big Fish, and he's made some great albums with the Heartbreakers. Even his solo albums have been peppered by nearly every member of the band. So what would Petty be without the Heartbreakers? Could he put on a good show with a different band? Does he stay with them only for familiarity's sake, or are they an essential part of his musical persona?

The best musicians compliment each other, becoming a tight unit that functions as one, familiarizing themselves with the others' styles. I suppose I'd have to see a live show with the Heartbreakers to know how good they are; listening to recordings, your guess is as good as mine in terms of their importance.

WEEK 64

ARTIST OF THE WEEK: Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers

MY LISTENING: I listened to Damn the Torpedoes (1979) every day this week. I also managed to put on Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers (1976), Full Moon Fever (1989) and Wildflowers (1994) two times each.

WHAT I KNEW BEFORE: Basically, "Free Fallin'." And that one Superbowl where Tom Petty played the halftime show.

WHAT I LIKED:

At his best, Tom Petty strips down rock and roll to its most basic elements, and crafts a hell of an enjoyable song out them. In particular, his early work is so good partially because of it's simplicity. True, his eponymous debut album has a little bit of filler, but when you leave with the bluesy "Breakdown" or the upbeat pop ballad of "American Girl" running through your head, you really don't mind.

But, out of his early stuff, Damn the Torpedoes definitely has the best collection of songs, with hardly a clunker in the bunch. While songs like "Refugee" have rightfully earned their place in the Classic Rock Canon, underplayed gems like the heartfelt "Louisiana Rain" are just as enjoyable to listen to. Tom Petty (and the Heartbreakers) manage to string together a great set of hits on this album without ever missing a beat or trying too hard. Damn the Torpedoes is an enjoyable album because it sticks with basic rock performed in an unadorned style - and the songwriting and the performance are solid. Petty's not trying to rewrite the Book of Rock. Instead, he's content to celebrate its roots.

But the Petty album I enjoyed the most this week was Wildflowers, a later album that seems to be regarded as only a minor classic at best. I only listened to it because it happened to be on the shelf at my public library. I'm glad I did - while the critics don't seem to talk about it like Damn the Torpedoes or Full Moon Fever, Wildflowers is an incredible record. Here, Petty sounds his most rootsy and sincere, his songs no longer accompanied by the overdubbed bombast of songs like "Free Fallin'." The beginning of the album explores the country side of rock and roll, with songs like "You Don't Know How It Feels" and "Wildflowers," the latter being a soft, beautiful track with one of Petty's best melodies. But by the album ends with classic Petty rock, like the unkempt guitars of "House in the Woods," full of the riffs and hooks Petty is great at. Wildflowers is the album that makes the best case for Petty being a great artist, and not just some dude who stitches together a batch simple rock songs every time he wants to make a buck.

WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE:

Full Moon Fever, produced by ELO-auteur Jeff Lynne at the end of the 80s, is decidedly more streamlined and smoother than most of the other Petty that I listened to. And while I don't dislike the megahit "Free Fallin'," I'm starting to think it's overrated - a catchy melody ramped up to a pretentious, faux-cathartic conclusion. Several other songs on the album managed to almost but not quite catch my interest - "Zombie Zoo" might have been a good song without the weird 80s instrumentation and echoey vocals.

But perhaps the worst thing about Tom Petty is that, with the exception of Wildflowers, I found myself becoming bored with him by the end of the week. As mentioned above, he's great at fashioning together good old-fashioned rock songs, devoid of bells and whistles. But that makes the bulk of Petty's output extremely expendable, and somewhat bland. There's hardly a bad song on Damn the Torpedoes, but you're also going to leave the album without very many memorable songs, either - songs like "Even the Losers" or "Shadow of a Doubt" just don't have any staying power.

Too often, it seems, Petty plays it safe. It's certainly part of his appeal - his songs are catchy and well-crafted. But it seems like there's a lack of energy on Petty's part a good deal of the time - good songwriting is only half of the equation, and it seems that Petty is easily contented with going through the motions and cranking out easily digestible and disposable rock. It's rock that kids and grandparents will love, but I think that's partially because it can be so plain.

FURTHER EXPLORATION WOULD ENTAIL: There's a handful of more Petty albums, the most famous of which seem to be Hard Promises (1981), and Into the Great Wide Open (1991). Petty also was part of a supergroup known as the Traveling Wilburys, with Jeff Lynne, George Harrison, Roy Orbison and Bob Dylan - a cast list so impressive they might just be worth checking out.

BEST SONG YOU'VE HEARD: "Mary Jane's Last Dance"
This song was recorded during the Wildflowers session, and it should have been included. I like rock songs tinged with nostalgia and regret.

BEST SONG YOU HAVEN'T HEARD: "Time to Move On"

NEXT WEEK'S ARTIST: The Byrds
Continue...

Sunday, June 27, 2010

After the Jump: Missed Connections

mccrystal1This week’s podcast is a long one, in no small part because we get into quite a conversation about this week’s firing of Gen. Stanley McChrystal. We do sneak some pop culture in there, though, and we belay most of the vidjagame talk that so consumed last week’s podcast.

Aside from the Current Events, we discuss missed connections, Ryan North, Futurama’s triumphant return, Obama's Internet kill switch, and the launch of the OnLive gaming service. Enjoy, won’t you?

Thanks for listening! See you next week!

Continue...

Writer’s Jukebox – Mozart, Mosshart, and Mr. November

Not much in the way of new stuff.  I tend to mull over albums for months at a time (when I’m listening to whole albums that is), and it seems Rob’s the same way.  Pankin never fails to surprise with his latest listening habits.

I’m still turning to LCD Soundsystem’s new This Is Happening every time I need something to listen to.  Rob simply cannot get over The National.  Pankin, the odd man out, is jamming to Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart – specifically, his Requiem.

I love how well-rounded we are.

PankinThe Requiem in Popular Culture

Mozart's Requiem is one of my favorite pieces of music. Ever since I first heard it, I was drawn to the haunting melody of the Introitus, the driving fugal structure of the Kyrie, and the relentless urgency of the Confutatis. There's no Requiem in Popular Culture section of its Wikipedia page, but if there were, you might see that the Dies Irae was used in this scene from X2, and that Kubrick made use of the Rex Tremendae section in a minor scene in Eyes Wide Shut.

I'm not a religious guy by any means, and so far listening to the Requiem hasn't inspired me to go out and learn all the intricacies of the Catholic mass. It hasn't even inspired me to research into all the myths and theories about who's actually responsible for its composition. As of now, I'm still too fascinated by the music itself to do any real analysis involving reading.

I have, however, done some analysis involving listening. I got my hands on two different recordings of the Requiem, and compared them to each other, movement to movement. The one I grew up with was conducted by Herbert Von Karajan, who emphasizes changes in dynamics and big, full orchestrations. It's as if he's making a strong case for later Mozart as the transition from the Classical to the Romantic period in music, rather than early Beethoven. Claudio Abbado's version is much lighter and more rhythmically consistent, likely more in keeping with the musical style of the time in which the piece was composed. The jury's still out on which one I like better, but it's really a question for the musicologists out there.

CraigRob Covered This Already

A month or two ago, Rob included The Dead Weather in his Spring album round-up.  Of frontwoman Allison Mosshart, he wrote: “I’ve never been simultaneously attracted to and terrified by anyone quite like Allison Mosshart.”  I agree with him completely.

The Dead Weather possess a frightening sound: ghostly backing vocals, Mosshart’s scratchy crooning, subterranean blues guitar.  I don’t know what the hell is going on most of the time, and I don’t really want to.  I just let their dirty, dusky sound wash over me in songs like “No Horse.”  (Well, “wash” probably isn’t the right word. How about “grime” over me?  That’s a verb, right?)

And my open love affair with LCD Soundsystem’s This Is Happening continues.  The track getting the most play right now is “Home.”  So many beautiful things are happening here.  The wistful vocal harmonies echo back to the opening track on the album “Dance Yrself Clean.”  The bass and percussion demonstrate James Murphy’s ability to make ennui danceable. 

Two lyrics jump out at me every time.  “Night has such a local ring/And love and rock are fickle things/And you know it” kills me each listen with the love and rock line.  Murphy then declares with heartbreaking humanity to the song’s anonymous object: “You’re afraid of what you need/If you weren’t, I don’t know what we’d talk about.”  Way to get me right in the gut, Murph.

RobA National Alligator

I'll stop listening to The National soon - I swear. But until "soon," I'm listening to Alligator, the 2005 album that put the Brooklyn band on the map. Fans of Boxer and High Violet might be surprised by Alligator's unburnished messiness. The chorus of fist-pumper "Mr. November" has frontman Matt Berninger shouting "I'm Mr. November, I won't fuck us over / I won't fuck us over, I'm Mr. November" while drummer Bryan Devendorf slams out sixteenth-notes on the snare. Berninger also gets screamy on "Abel," adding a little scratch to his baritone as he howls "My mind's not right, my mind's not right." 

High Violet, released last month, put The National on the larger cultural map, and with good reason: everyone can enjoy the consummate craftsmanship and artistic fussing-over that makeViolet one of the year's best. But it's nice to see the band a little younger on Alligator - a little more unhinged, a little more desperate, a little more experimental. Gator's tracks don't always connect, but when they do...well, listen to "Daughters of the Soho Riots."

Continue...

Sunday Reading: Gaga, Feminism, and Bad Faith

Lady-Gaga-jet-2 I am fascinated by Lady Gaga. Let me refine that: I am fascinated by Lady Gaga’s phenomenon.

I can’t explain why a girl my age born Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta should garner worldwide acclaim by donning crazy outfits, singing in three different genres at once, and claiming to critique objectification while simultaneously allowing herself to be the subject of intense objectification.

Is she a musical mastermind? Or a performance artist with a commitment level to rival the late Andy Kaufman?

In a recent New York Times Opinionator column, Tufts University Philosophy Chair and author Nancy Bauer revisits the question: is Lady Gaga a feminist?

After addressing Gaga’s own wishy-washiness on the subject, Bauer examines the potential impact of the performer’s mixed messages:

“The tension in Gaga’s self-presentation, far from being idiosyncratic or self-contradictory, epitomizes the situation of a certain class of comfortably affluent young women today…Gaga is explicit in her insistence that, since feminine sexuality is a social construct, anyone, even a man who’s willing to buck gender norms, can wield it.”

Bauer goes on to posit that Gaga’s “Don’t worry about my crazy sexuality, it’s all an act” narrative is gaining widespread adoption among young women. She then invokes Beauvoir, Sartre, and Hegel in an exploration of Gaga’s supposed duality and wonders if girls can even find the dividing line – or care to.

Full disclosure: I’m a dude. I can’t begin to fully comprehend the societal pressures at play here. But I can be fascinated by them.

Continue...

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Book Review: Under Heaven

usunderheavenReaders might remember my post from a few weeks back lauding and recapping the novels of my favorite author, Guy Gavriel Kay, in preparation for a review of his newest book, Under Heaven. After a savory month of taking my sweet time slipping through its pages, I am prepared to discuss my thoughts here.

First off, I will say this: I have never read a Kay book that I didn’t like. Recognizing that expectation, I was in no way disappointed.

Framed in fantasy world that mirrors the glory of the Tang Dynasty in 8th century China – a time known for great progress and stability – the story begins simply with a single character, Shen Tai, who has been honoring the memory of his late father by burying the bones of the dead at a great battle site where his father served as a general. From there the tale unfolds through the events leading up to the bloody and chaotic An Shi rebellion, a period that saw the population  in China decline by approximately 36 million.

Of course, in Kay’s world (The Empire of Kitai, rather than China), all these historical figures, places, and events, have slightly different names with just enough familiarity for someone knowledgeable to discover their origins while establishing just enough divergence to grant Kay  the artistic elbow-room that he needs to create a story. An Shi, the foreign, obese, powerful, and brutal general from the north becomes An Li (or Roshan, when referred to colloquially by his barbarian name). The capital city of present day Xi’an, known then as Chang’an, becomes the Xinan. References to Japan in the east name the Koreini Peninsula.There is little subtlety in his name-changes; Kay is not trying to hide his influences. This stylistic choice is one that I respect and enjoy, especially if I’m slightly familiar with the history that he’s employing. For the instances in which Kay chooses history that I know pathetically little about – like this one, for example – it gives me a fun excuse to learn it with context.

As the story opens, Tai has been spending nearly a year and half burying the dead at Kuala Nor between borders of the empire of Kitai and the country of  Tagur (which I believe represents the Tibetan Empire) to honor his father’s memory. He gives equal weight to the remains of both Kitan and Taguran forces. After a chapter of pure monologue and retrospect by our isolated protagonist, a messenger arrives from the Taguran army to inform Tai of the gift of 250 horses from the far western country of Sardia, granted to him by the married-off Kitai princess Cheng-wan, now wife of the Taguran Prince, to honor what he has done to quiet the ghosts that moan and stir by the lake.

You give a man one of the famed Sardian horses to reward him greatly. You give him four or five to exalt him above his fellows, propel him towards rank, and earn him jealousy, possibly mortal jealousy. Two hundred and fifty is an unthinkable gift, a gift to overwhelm an emperor.”

From this point Tai recognizes that his life will quickly become complicated, only further motivated by the immediate arrival of an old friend and the subsequent appearance of Tai’s first would-be assassin. Understanding that the second-son of a military general must now make his way to an aging emperor, quickly thrusting him in an unfamiliar role enmeshed in potentially deadly political intrigue, Tai departs for the capital.

In addition to the raw pleasure that I get from Kay’s storytelling ability, I have found in his latest books an exploratory style and personality that has developed from novel to novel. His previous work, Ysabel, departed from his traditional historical-fantasy settings to create a modern fantasy. It seemed to me to indicate Kay’s interest in pursuing new directions within his writing. I thought Ysabel was amazing, and I’m a skeptic about contemporary fantasy. I assumed Under Heaven would be a return to form, which in many ways it was.

But what caught my attention in this novel, different from those previous, was Kay’s complete immersion in the poetic style of eastern mysticism and philosophy. At first I couldn’t quite put my finger on what felt so different about the flow of his writing this time around. It seemed choppy at times, smooth and rhythmic at others. Naturally, in a culture that emphasized poetry and metaphor, Kay’s characters were often poets or trained to at least recite and compose poetry frequently, and after reading enough of these somewhat-awkward, somewhat-lovely verses, it came together for me. The poems felt choppy because they were cross-cultural, and anglicized into a language that they weren’t meant to be in. Everything about Kay’s novel suddenly read to me like translated eastern language-art often does. I was impressed.

When I realized that, it was all over. The story could essentially have gone to hell and I wouldn’t have cared. Kay so masterfully used the English language like a brush-stroke, leaving behind that sort of feeling that I get from modern art where I feel too inferior to understand the complexity in its subtlety. Then Kay juxtaposes his poetry with the brutality, xenophobia, death and loss that he so masterfully reveals to you with his already honed abilities as an author. One of the themes that Kay returns to in Under Heaven is that of balance, an idea that drove many of the greatest writings that emerged from ancient China; the balance between your personal desires and your public duty, between the internal and the external needs of the individual, between beauty and the necessity of the ugly, between the ideal world and the world that unravels beyond our control.

The women of this story are beautiful, intelligent, and deeply manipulative – some for good, others for motivations that will forever remain in the fog. They are present to drive almost every turning point in the story, and Kay chooses to stylistically write their points of view in the present tense. This choice, in my opinion, often seems more self-indulgent and annoying than anything else. But from Kay [naturally, since I’m already enamored enough to support him almost unequivocally] it was brilliant. Not only do these women – the stunningly beautiful consort of the emperor, a former Sardian courtesan turned concubine to the first minister, Tai’s young sister Li-Mei who has been raised to the imperial family only to be married off to a barbarian leader to the north – shape the story and the fate of their world through their actions, they are also portrayed with this constant sense of the present. They have the ability to change the story as it is happening, whereas everyone else must recall it as it has happened. Near the climactic conclusion, we constantly hear Tai’s narrative voice describing the standout moments, recounting what he would later look back on to always remember from those important events. Initially hesitant, I came to absolutely love this stylistic choice.

Obviously I loved this book. I had to stretch to really find a complaint with it, though perhaps it is a weakness that I myself created with my high expectations. I have always found Kay’s endings to be gripping, climactic and shocking, always pulling me in, leading me by the nose, and then deeply satisfying me even as they were tragic or unexpected. The ending of this one wasn’t quite as strong as many of his others. But that’s what being good at something will do to you. Great becomes the norm and merely “better than good” becomes disappointing.

The world could bring you poison in a jeweled cup, or surprising gifts. Sometimes you don’t know which of them it was…

Continue...

Saturday Morning TV: The Rebirth of a Citizen

Stupidly ambitious, tongue-in-cheek DIY movies warm my heart.  As do unnecessary Harry Caray impressions.

Continue...

Friday, June 25, 2010

Jumping on Goombas for Charity

mariohooray_580I love marathon gaming for charity.  If I had the time and the personnel, I’d probably do one myself – though I’m not sure what games I’d choose, since a lot of the better franchises have already been claimed (and some of the worst).

Since I won’t be marathoning any time soon, I will point you towards the Mario Marathon.  Now in its third year, the Mario Marathon raises money for Penny Arcade’s Child Play charity.

Three guys will play Mario games until the money dries up.  They’ve organized a list of 800 levels across nine Mario games.  Each level has a dollar prerequisite, so once the donation total reaches that amount they must play that level.  For example, the last, most difficult Super Mario Sunshine levels won’t be played unless they raise upwards of $140,000.

If they’re as fun to watch as they were last year, I think they’ll have no problem.

Continue...

RUSH on the Walk of Fame!


I was brought up to believe the Universe has a plan.
We are only human; it's not ours to understand.

Thus runs the first words of Rush's newest B-Side "BU2B" released earlier this month. But it's news like this that helps me make some sense of the universe: this morning, Rush received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame!

The ceremony took place at 11:30am on Hollywood Blvd. Due to work, I was sadly unable to attend, but notable speakers included Billy Corgan (Smashing Pumpkins) and Donna Halper, the Cleveland DJ who helped make Rush famous with her daily samplings of Working Man off their first (self-titled) album.

I'm glad about the recognition, but I'm equally psyched to see how this new publicity - coupled with the new award-winning documentary Beyond the Lighted Stage - will impact the energy surrounding the band's upcoming world tour. Don't worry, you'll hear all about it after I attend the show in Los Angeles on 8/13/10.

GET EXCITED! THE SUSPENSE IS KILLING ME! Continue...

Film Review: Robin Hood

I'm a sucker for historical epics. In an era where cinematic blockbusters are dominated by the CGI-festooned comic book movies, I prefer a good old-fashioned flick with swordfights, castles, and about a million extras on horseback standing around. As such, I was excited to discover that Ridley Scott was continuing his perennial bromance with Russell Crowe to produce a new version of the Robin Hood story.

You're probably familiar with the central Robin Hood story, even if you've forgotten everything about the classic Errol Flynn version or the less-than-classic Kevin Costner rendition. Robin Hood is an outlaw archer in the Sherwood Forest who steals from the rich and gives to the poor during the reign of the brutal, tax-heavy King John. His love interest, Maid Marian, and his band of Merry Men, including Little John and Friar Tuck, assist him in helping the poor peasants and foiling the dastardly Sheriff of Nottingham.

Scott's Robin Hood incorporates nearly all of these elements, but the end result is far different from what we've come to expect. I hesitate to use the phrase "gritty remake" - a phrase too often thrown around these days - but much of this Robin Hood replaces the cartoonish swashbuckling of earlier versions of the legend with a darker, more dour historical epic.

That's the first hurdle that one has to overcome - this Robin Hood is not the Robin Hood we knew as children. Rather than concentrating on Robin's life as an outlaw, this movie instead focuses on how Robin became such a legendary figure - his "origin story," to borrow another trite phrase. Instead of situating Robin Hood in Sherwood Forest, the film instead begins with Robin trekking home from the Crusades with Richard the Lion-Hearted. He and his British troops are gaunt, cynical and exhausted after the violence they have seen fighting in the Holy Land.

The dashing antics of the Merry Men are instead replaced with epic medieval battle scenes - a stirring early setpiece in which Richard's men storm a French castle, and an exciting conclusion that involves a French invasion across the English Channel.

To call this version more "historical" is wrong (the movie is as anachronistic as any), but Scott's Robin Hood is certainly more morally ambiguous and politically complex than earlier renditions of the tale. Robin and his companions still have nightmares after having been forced to kill Muslim women and children while fighting for Jerusalem. King Richard is not the benevolent monarch of earlier stories, but instead a tired, conflicted ruler who seems regretful that he drained his country's coffer in such a long and bloody Crusade. The plot is far from the simple rich versus poor narrative we've come to expect - instead, Scott stitches together a convoluted narrative of King John falling prey to a French spy, and a three-sided conflict involving Robin Hood's crew of peasants, King John's oppressive forces, and the invading French army. It's not what w're used to, but once you get past the fact it's a new story, you begin to realize it's not a bad one.

Thus, we only get one of Robin Hood's daring raids against the Rich, and instead we get several battles scenes with a rousing musical score and a couple thousand extras. If you were hoping for the traditional Robin Hood, you might be disappointed (and I believe that's why many critics were), but Ridley Scott pulls off the epic battle very well, and the scenes in Robin Hood feel like he's simply perfecting what he already started in Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven.

Elsewhere, the movie excels in its supporting cast. Oscar Isaac does an amazing job of portraying the petulant, incompetent King John - the vain king that nonetheless must make common cause with Robin Hood. The true villain is Sir Godfrey, a cold, ruthless French spy who is played excellent by Mark Strong. For the royal family, we also get old King Richard, uncertain about his role in history, as well as Eleanor of Aquitaine, a stern woman trying to prevent her son King John from ruining the kingdom. And with the Merry Men, there's a lovable albeit underutilized Friar Tuck, as well as Maid Marian and her aging father.

Strangely enough, in this large and colorful cast of characters, Robin Hood himself is the least appealing. Russell Crowe's performance seems uninspired, and though Englishmen across the island swear their fealty to him, Crowe does not exude the charisma, or even basic leadership, to make this sort of hero worship make sense. In a film where the villains are excellent and the supporting cast is extremely enjoyable to watch, Robin Hood himself is rather dull. Cate Blanchett tries her best to put some life and energy into the Robin/Marian love story, but even that ends up being the least interesting plotline in the film.

Despite the vapidity of the central role, I enjoyed the movie immensely. It's not perfect by any means - aside from the boring protagonist, there's also a strange and historically tenuous subplot concerning the Magna Carta that could have been left out entirely. But as Summer Action Flicks go, I found Robin Hood more well-crafted and intelligent than most. I don't think that it will go down as the Timeless Hollywood Epic that Ridley Scott always seems to be aiming for. But it is an interesting spin on a classic tale. In a franchise that could have just gone through the motions and given us some stupid stunts and a handful of annoyingly glib one-liners, Scott aims to add some historical gravitas to the Robin Hood legacy, and if he doesn't always succeed, I don't think we should blame him for trying. It's certainly better than the Kevin Costner version.

FINAL VERDICT: 57 Congos
Continue...

Moving On With Toy Story 3

poster_toy-story-3 I was immediately skeptical when Pixar announced Toy Story 3.  I, like everyone, had fond memories of the original and fuzzy (but ultimately also fond) memories of the sequel, but I wasn’t quite sure why we were getting a third. 

Pixar’s been on a roll lately, churning out original movies that – despite their optimism and colorful characters – don’t pull their punches.  A story about an adorable lost clown fish opens with the little guy’s mom being eaten.  A doe-eyed robot cleans up our photorealistic trash and then falls in love, but we’re too cartoonishly fat to care until our ship goes all 2001 on us.  An elderly man rediscovers his love of adventure, but not before a montage of his life reduces everyone in the room to a blubbering mess.

So why revisit a franchise with eleven years of dust on it?  Because the last time Pixar tapped that well, they created one of the most well-received movies of all time.  They actually had nothing to lose coming into this.  They’ve amassed absurd amounts of credibility over the last decade, both commercial and critical.  Plus, they had the popular Toy Story brand to fall back on if they somehow failed to knock it out of the park.

And knock it out of the park they did.

In case you’ve missed every Pixar movie since the last Toy Story, the film’s opening gambit quickly demonstrates how far the studio’s come technically.  It lovingly recreates a scene from the first movie – Andy playing with his toys – with a few twists.  Mr. Potato Head still plays the role of diabolical bank robber.  Andy’s beloved cowboy Woody still saves the day with his force field-eating dinosaur.  Only this time around, Pixar shows us the play through Andy’s eyes.  Hamm the Piggy Bank flies a ginormous space ship armed with a devastating, thermonuclear Barrel of Monkeys.  Buzz Lightyear’s jetpack roars and his lasers sizzle.  Pixar’s harvested an excellent crop from its massive server farms; the animation here is gorgeous.

Sid in Toy Story (1).  He is horrifying.Pixar’s not out to become some sort of cartoon Michael Bay, however.  (I believe Mr. Bay’s got that covered.)  The quality of animation shows not only in the action sequences, but in the film’s treatment of the human characters.  Humans in the original Toy Story were creatures lifted straight from the Uncanny Valley, which worked in the scenes with the terrifying Sid but looking at Andy’s family unpleasant.  In Toy Story 3, humans fit more naturally into the environment, moving fluidly and expressing nuanced emotion with their faces.  One stunning moment of facial animation occurs after Andy quarrels briefly with his mother.  The sigh that follows her exit is rendered in incredible detail.  The way his face falls, how he takes a moment with his hand to his temple, his posture as he sinks into his desk chair: it all contributes to a character demonstrating believable emotions.

And feel them he (and the rest of the cast) shall.  Toy Story 3 wastes no time getting to the crux of the matter: fading relevance.  There’s no feel-good sequence to match the earlier movies’ “While the kid’s away, the toys will play” scenes.  The toys can’t bear Andy’s absence any longer.  After a brief, heartwarming montage of home movies showing Andy with his toys, Woody and the gang enact an elaborate ruse to get Andy’s attention.  A frustrated, college-bound Andy briefly holds Rex, who later recounts excitedly to the others, “He held me!  He held me!”  It’s not enough, and everyone knows it.

Several unfortunate coincidences send the group to Sunnyside Daycare, whose toy world is reigned over by Lots-O-Huggin’ Bear (whose excellent Southern drawl comes courtesy of Ned Beatty) – Lotso, for short.  Lotso, who walks with a cane and rides around in the back of a Tonka truck, promises the new toys day after day and year after year of play with wonderful kids in need of good toys.  Woody breaks with his longtime pals, choosing allegiance to his boy over the equivalent of toy immortality. 

Things don’t work out for either party.  Woody gets waylaid on his trip back to Andy.  Taken home by a soul-crushingly cute little girl named Bonnie, Woody spends the night with her toys (my favorite of whom is an aspiring thespian hedgehog voiced by Timothy Dalton) before setting off to rescue his friends who’re being held prisoner at Sunnyside.  Lotso is not the gentle bear he seems to be.  Wronged by a previous owner, Lotso views moving on as the ultimate betrayal.  It’s only fitting then that he becomes the primary obstacle to the toys returning home and coming to grips with the end of their time with Andy.

Yes, Toy Story 3 is surprisingly dark at times.  Yes, it tugs quite hard on the old heartstrings.  And yes, I certainly could’ve done without the 3D (I’ll take more vivid colors over fake depth any day).  But it’s all in keeping with the spirit of toys – namely, fun.  The glee of a successful escape plan.  The old-fashioned bickering of the Potato Heads.  The confused, multifaceted, and shockingly well-written Ken.  The humor merges flawlessly with action which then quickly gives way to the story.

Toy Story 3 is a sterling example of Pixar’s uncanny ability to seamlessly blend digital wizardry, broad commercial appeal, and mature storytelling – all culminating in one of the most moving goodbyes I’ve seen in a while.  I don’t know that I’ve ever had my heart so summarily broken and warmed. 

If you’ve ever owned toys, bring tissues – or at least keep your 3D glasses on until the tears dry.

Final Verdict: 77 Congos

Continue...

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Apple iOS 4 Review: Evolutionary, Not Revolutionary

article-1277118768752-09EF7EB1000005DC-762335_636x300 Whatever side of Apple’s fence you’re on – anti-Apple zealot, pro-Apple zealot, or the rare realist who reacts reasonably to the virtues and shortcomings of their products – you’ve got to admit that that whole phone thing they did was a pretty big deal.

Since its release in 2007, the iPhone (and its phone-less counterpart, the iPod Touch – for the purposes of this article, assume I mean both when I mention the phone) has received a series of software upgrades to make it more capable. Some of these have completely changed the device – the App Store, arguably the device’s best feature, came with version 2.0 – and some have introduced facepalm-inducing features that should have been included from the beginning. Version 3.0’s addition of copy-and-paste tops this list.

Version 4.0 is somewhere in between these two extremes. A few nice enhancements make the phone a bit nicer to use, but people stuck on iOS 3 (more on that in a second) aren’t missing out on anything life-changing.

No iOS 4 you!

Let’s start with a list of can’ts: the new iOS will not run at all on the original iPhone, or the first-generation iPod Touch. This sets a precedent for a three-year software support cycle that Apple is likely to follow with future updates – iOS 5 will probably drop support for the iPhone 3G, iOS 6 will drop support for the 3GS, and so on.

Next, while iOS 4 is supported on the iPhone 3G, many of its marquee features are missing – there’s no multitasking, no home screen wallpaper, and no external bluetooth keyboard support. For customers who bought the iPhone 3G when it came out, this is Apple’s way of reminding you that you haven’t bought a new phone from them in a little while and could you please pony up for another one. For iPhone 3G users who bought their phones more recently – they were sold in stores until the beginning of this month – this amounts to little more than a kick in the teeth.

In short, Apple would like it very much if you replaced your phone about once every two years, whenever your AT&T contract runs out.

So, what does it do?

So, okay, assume you’ve got an iPhone 3GS, or that you’re the sort of person who camps out in front of Best Buy for a week so you can be the first yuppie on your block to have an iPhone 4. What’s different?IMG_0126Let’s start with the boatload of cosmetic changes. Apple knows from years of Mac OS X development that if you don’t make stuff look at least a little different, it creates the illusion that things aren’t happening. Home screen wallpapering (see above) sounds like (and is, really) an insignificant feature, but it does make the device easier to personalize, which consumers like.

IMG_0127 The next big cosmetic change is more functional – dragging one app icon on top of another one now puts both of those apps into a folder, which can make organization much easier for people with loads of stuff installed.IMG_0129 The iPod app also gets a bit of a facelift, with a prominent Shuffle button and album art now displayed at the top of album track lists. Once you’re actually playing music, though, the app acts basically the same as it did in iOS 3.

IMG_0131 Moving on to some of the more functional changes, heavy email users will appreciate some of the changes to that app. People with multiple accounts can now use the “All Inboxes” feature to see all of their email collected together in one place. Additionally, mail is now displayed in threads by default – an email and all replies under the same subject are now grouped together, instead of as a long, disjointed series of replies. Gmail users are already familiar with this concept. This feature can be turned off, for people who prefer the old-school view.

IMG_0128 The biggest addition to the new software is its ability to multitask – double-tapping the Home button will bring up a list of all apps you’ve launched since you turned the phone on. This capability has always been part of the OS, but only in iOS 4 has it been made available to third-party app developers (this is why you could play iPod music and check your email at the same time, but the Pandora app would stop playing as soon as you left it to do something else).

Some would argue that the feature is only half-baked, and at this point I’m not especially inclined to disagree. Apple still puts limits on multi-tasking in order to preserve the snappiness of its user interface – most apps are simply frozen in place until you come back to them, so videos don’t necessarily queue and downloads don’t necessarily happen when you leave an app to go do something else in another one. The menu, which doesn’t close anything automatically, quickly becomes hopelessly cluttered. App developers also need to add multitasking capabilities to their apps individually, and while I’m sure everyone will be up to speed in a month or two the support at the moment is a bit lackluster. Still, it’s a small step in the right direction.

IMG_0130There is, of course, a laundry list of smaller features that will vary in importance to you based on how you use your iPhone:

  • The iPhone can finally be tethered to a computer for on-the-road Internet access (if, of course, you cough up the extra $20 a month to AT&T)
  • Apple’s iBooks e-reader app is set to make its iPhone debut
  • Wi-Fi network connections now stay on even when the device is asleep
  • Spellchecking is now done in every app system-wide
  • An orientation lock (accessed by double-tapping the Home button and going left, see above) can now disable flipping between portrait and landscape mode
  • The Game Center app looks to bring Xbox Live-style Achievements and friend lists to the iPhone – game apps will need to be updated to support it, of course
  • Microsoft’s Bing search engine joins Yahoo! and Google (the default) as an option
  • The phone’s lock screen now supports alphanumerical passwords
  • The camera now has 5x digital zoom

There are others (see a more comprehensive overview here), but these are the most notable user-facing innovations.

Conclusions

The changes in Apple’s latest iPhone operating system, contrary to what Apple would like to tell you, are mostly incremental. The still-limited multitasking ability is the new software’s biggest advancement, and while being able to play Pandora while you do other things is nice, it won’t fundamentally change how you use your iPhone.

As updates go, though, I’m fairly happy with it. The New Stuff Excitement that I’m prone to wore off pretty quickly, but the changes to the Mail app and the ability to put apps in folders are both genuinely useful features to which I’ve already gotten used.

Do we have any other upgraders in the audience? How has the change been for you? Sound off in the Comments section!

Continue...

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Oscars May Move To January; Millions to Be Bored to Tears Two Months Earlier


Deadline is reporting that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is considering moving next year's ceremony up to January. In fact, Deadline editor-in-chief Nikki Finke is reporting that the Academy Board of Governors met last night to discuss the change.

So you might be thinking, "Who gives a crap about the boring-ass Oscars? I'll just not watch them in January like I didn't watch them in March."

"Boring?!" I'd say. "But you'd be missing all those amazing, uh, dance numbers? And the hosts were amazing! Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin? They in no way delivered a flat, completely unfunny opening full of awkward pauses."

Okay, so the Oscars are often painfully dull, and the Academy has made it clear that they will resort to anything to get people to actually watch the damn telecast (except, like, make the telecast entertaining). An unnamed studio exec told Finke that the change "will make the Oscars the definitive awards show again," thus encouraging people to watch the "New Super Important" version of the Oscars.

Problem is, the Oscars have been "definitive" for quite some time now, and it hasn't helped their numbers a lick. This year's telecast earned the highest ratings in five years not because it was "definitive," but because that movie with the naked blue people that made eighty bajillion dollars was nominated.

But while the change in timing probably won't increase viewership, it will totally transform the release schedule for studios vying for Oscar. Instead of releasing all their Oscar bait in one, frantic, sleepless three-week period in December, studios will be forced to release all their Oscar bait in one frantic, sleepless, three-week period in November. This means that all those AMPAS members who watched all their screeners during the Christmas holiday will be SOL. Finke also points out that the early distribution of said screeners will mean pirated copies will end up on the web even farther in advance of a film's theatrical release.

Personally, this seems like an insanely idiotic move on the part of the Academy. Then again, I've been wrong about this showbiz stuff before.

Whadda y'all think? Sound off in the comments section. Continue...

Down In The Treme: Season Finale, “I’ll Fly Away”

tremePNG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Two Charge Shot!!! writers duck into New Orleans for a taste of David Simon’s new show, “Treme.” Hit the jump for their take on the season finale. Spoilers ahoy.

Rob: "Treme" gets good right when it gets done. Good job, guys. Now I need to watch the second season or something. I guess.

Jordan: Like Al Pacino said in The Godfather III, "Just when I thought I was out...they pull me back in!" Yeah, I thought this was, overall, a really stellar episode of "Treme." And I think because, mostly, it played to its strengths. LaDonna, who has emerged as the best character on the show, got a ton of screen time, and just about all of it was very affecting. I never really felt for Daymo, but I was moved by his funeral because of my love for his sister.

Rob: I was reminded of the show's earliest and strongest moments. The sense of wonder, mirth in the midst of tragedy - everything had a kind of dramatic swoon to it, mannered but somehow sincere. I know I bitched about Prof. Creighton Bernette's suicide, but I was rocked by the mourning of his wife, Toni. She was incredible. I haven't seen grief portrayed that well in a good long while.

Jordan: Wonder is a great word for it; there's a moment where Sonny - seriously, why couldn't he have gotten axed? - is trudging around the streets, stoned off his "$40 Miller High Life," when a Mardi Gras Indian passes through the foreground of the shot. That simple juxtaposition of sadness and magic was so much more powerful than an entire season of the show's less interesting characters emote their asses off.

Rob: Sonny's plotline was some seriously weak writing. It yielded some good music in the beginning, but seriously, who cares about some half-assed pianist smashing his keyboard, reneging on good intentions and relapsing into bad habits? I like his girlfriend, and I like that she cutely (and chastely - David Simon, you white knight) ends up with shaggy DJ Davis McAlary in the end. And good on you, Davis, played by a remarkable Steve Zahn - you kept me in the show more than anyone else. Your rose-tinted mania was a great way to see New Orleans.

Jordan: Yeah, Davis really did get dramatically less irritating over the course of the season. He was in danger of being the "cool guy who's actually lame" at first, but Simon wisely made him into a lovable tool. So, at the end of the day, Davis did "work" as a character. What else do you think ended up "working" when viewed in the context of the whole season? And what sticks out to you as failing to live up to its potential?

Rob: The music. Though we initially feared "Treme" might melt into one woozy music video, the scenes of musicians recording, performing and lazily jamming out in their homes turned out to be my favorite. New Orleans is justly known for its ragged, horn-heavy blues, and some things are better said in melody. The political subplots failed to pop, or even simmer: Albert Lambreaux's sit-in at the housing project was noble, but it ended in a facile detente with NOPD - a kind of live-and-let-live thing that felt less genuine than convenient. Worse, it felt like "The Wire"-lite: social prerogative clashes with a rigid, incomprehensible justice system. "Treme" was best when it stuck to the tunes.

Jordan: I'm split when it comes to the music. Because while I can honestly say there wasn't a single musical interlude I didn't enjoy, I prefer great writing to a great soundtrack. The political bits of "Treme" were particularly infuriating because they offered a window into what could have been a much more interesting show. What if "Treme" had been about the NOPD trying to rebuild New Orleans (both physically and institutionally) after the storm, and this show's characters had been the supporting cast? I think in trying to buck convention, Simon ended up avoiding what he's great at.

Rob: You're not the first person to pine for "The Wire: New Orleans." No doubt it would have been great, but "Treme" is something different, more like a watercolor to "The Wire"'s stern, realist oil painting. The colors splash and run together. The result is often indistinct and sometimes disappointing; but sometimes you get magic.

Jordan: Remember those moments at the end of each season of "The Wire" where Simon sets a montage of B-more city panoramas to some great song? Those moments were so affecting because they were so set apart from the "cinema concrete" of the rest of the show. "Treme" too often felt like all wistfulness with nothing to be wistful about. But, with its heart-stopping extended flashback sequence and arguably the best musical number of the season, the finale of "Treme" was certainly enough to get me back this season. And I didn't think I'd be saying that a week ago.

Continue...

Today’s War Stories: A Brief Intro

24filkinsa-600 Hear that drumming? It’s champagne corks hitting the roof at Rolling Stone, who just published what may turn out to be the most important work of journalism in the war in Afghanistan. In “The Runaway General,” U.S. commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal and his aides badmouth administration officials and trash White House policies. Meanwhile, freelancer Michael Hastings writes, the general’s gospel of counterinsurgency isn’t quite connecting with soldiers on the line. The conclusion: we aren’t winning.

Some might find Rolling Stone an odd choice of venue, but the rabble-rousing leftist mag has a history of sponsoring some of the best war journalism ever written. Hastings’ article won’t be remembered for its art– crafted for shock, I’d call it adequate – but RS was responsible for sending Michael Herr to Vietnam, where he would write the pieces that became ur-text Dispatches. Evan Wright, author of Operation: Iraqi Freedom book Generation Kill, was also an RS reporter.

As thousands read “Runaway General,” let’s take a look at the books that have chronicled the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan thus far. Dispatches came out nearly a decade after Americans pulled out of Vietnam, but already, our wars are producing some powerful literature.

Generation Kill

By Evan Wright

imggeneration20kill20book1 Rolling Stone embedded Wright with the Marines at a moment when thousands of guns, tanks and aircraft sat poised to make good on Saddam Hussein’s earlier promise of “The Mother of All Wars “. Wright ditched his assigned unit, linking up instead with a platoon of commandos in the 1st Recon Battalion. His account of the invasion is driven not by politics and history, but by personality. At times, Generation Kill reads more like a road trip memoir than a piece of war reporting. Wright understands the larger political context, but he doesn’t let it infiltrate his pinpoint observations of a younger, stranger and more disillusioned generation going to war. Remember – this was the start of the embed program. The military adopted a “friends close, enemy closer” policy with the media, welcoming reporters to an officially-sanctioned, party-line view of the war. While Wright shakes those shackles early on, we feel a new respect for his writing – and for the Marines – when Lt. Nate Fick tells Wright to write everything as he sees it.

The creators of “The Wire” turned Generation Kill into an HBO miniseries in 2008, doing a remarkably good job of capturing the book’s vigor and personality. That many of Wright’s Recon Marines show up alongside the reporter in special-feature commentaries is a testament to a job well-done. Fick’s memoir, One Bullet Away, corroborates Generation Kill and confirms that Wright was not, in fact, a wimp.

The Forever War

By Dexter Filkins

the-forever-war The Forever War could have been awful. Meditations on jogging down the Euphrates River as a white, Western war correspondent could have easily lapsed into solipsistic vagueness – what am I doing here, I asked myself. I must be mad, risking my neck for a stupid story. But I’m a mad sort of guy, I guess – mad, and sexy. But Filkins is too good a reporter to spend too much time on himself, and The Forever War uses his gonzo persona – and indeed, war itself – as a point of departure, using it to reflect on the essential insanity of a culture that holds executions in sports stadiums.

Dexter Filkins has built his career on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. He earned his Pulizter reporting in the former country, and The Forever War is set largely in the latter. Rather than unspooling a Kuwait-to-Baghdad narrative like Generation Kill, Filkins’ book hops from year to country to subject, dwelling on strange, terrifying or improbable shards of his time in the Middle East. His chapter about suicide bombers, “Kill Yourself,” stays with me like a nightmare:

“Live bombs to live dogs. That would be DBIED, or Dog-Bourne IED. Also the D could have stood for Donkey…[The Marines] didn’t want to kill it, of course, but each time they tried to remove the suicide belt, it scampered away…Finally the Marines shot the donkey. It exploded.”

The Good Soldiers

By David Finkel

good-soldiers The Good Soldiers is the best book written about post-surge Iraq. Gen. David Petraeus’ bum-rush of money and soldiers can be (tentatively) credited with bringing Iraq back from the brink of all-out civil war; but as Finkel shows us, it doesn’t change much for the men on the ground, still tasked with fighting and dying regardless of the bigger picture.

We spend our time with an army battalion in Baghdad, following their tour from snarling, get-some eagerness to skittish paranoia: with only days left, who would be the last to die? As the colonel leaves his post in a helicopter, his valediction beautifully summarizes:

“Up rose the helicopters with their hatches still open, allowing Kauzlarich a last perfect view of the surge. Instead of opening his eyes, though, he closed them. They had won. He was sure of it. They were the difference. It was all good. But he had seen enough.

Sticking in the third-person, Finkel doesn’t fuss with the gritty new-journalistic gymnastics Filkins is so fond of. It’s more classical in the way it moves up and down the echelons, creating a rounded portrait from the trenches to the cubicles. But Finkel proves that a new, terrifying kind of war doesn’t necessarily demand the woozy, existential kind of reporting espoused by Herr and Filkins.

Lead photo credit: Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times

Continue...